Back a while I read a Goodread’s review for a Thai cookbook. At the time, though I found it weird, I told myself a cookbook was still a book, so the rules for rating still counted.
The other day, again on Goodreads, I saw a 3 star rating for another cookbook, and the weirdness of it came back.
How do you rate a cookbook? What do you take in consideration?
I recalled all the cookbooks my mom had and remember reading them when young. What’s there to rate?
Is it based on how great the recipes are? Is it based on how the recipes are explained? Or the yummy pictures? Do you have to cook all the recipes in that book before you rate it? If you think not, then why not? You’re reviewing and rating that book based on its quality, right? How can you tell the quality without trying all the recipes? Maybe the ones you didn’t try – for lack of ingredients, or because you didn’t feel like trying that one, or because it took time – were exactly the kind of food you like to eat. Wouldn’t that then, be unfair to the author who wrote it? Wouldn’t it be like rating a book without reading it?
What if you find only one or two handful of recipes you enjoy, but they’re great recipes that you now cook for every special occasion?
Would you rate the cookbook you have, or do you think it’s weird too? I’m seriously curious, guys, how do you rate a cookbook?
Only done it once – the cookbook related to a cuisine I am interested in hence I guess I wouldn’t have bought it, so key criteria were
Credibility – did I have a sense the writer had really tested these recipes or just thrown them together from primary sources?
Originality – were the recipes either new or bringing a new twist to familiar favourites (unless the book’s called ‘Classic Comfort Food’ or some such!)?
Clarity – would the instructions be easy to follow in terms of measures, steps, locating ingredients?
Appeal – would I want to eat it based on the recipe and supporting photos?
There we go: COCA!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Fair enough. But does that mean that you tried all the recipes or just read through, tried the ones that appealed? Did you wait until you’d gone through the whole book? What did you rate it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I must admit, I don’t usually rate them for the reasons mentioned. This one was so bad, I had to leave a review – the recipes were simply pulled together from different sources, but worst of all, it was meant to have been vegan but some dishes weren’t even vegetarian, e.g. use of chicken stock! I don’t usually leave ‘mean’ reviews for indie publications, but cynical bids to make ‘easy money’ like that one give us all a bad name, so it was (a generous) 2 stars. I am normally a dove when it comes to ratings!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Since my cookbooks are for decorative purposes only, I don’t feel qualified to rate them. I can’t stand to cook. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Lol. I love cooking! And baking too. I’ve read plenty of cookbooks, but I don’t feel qualified simply because I only follow recipes once – after that I add or remove ingredients as I see fit – and I never get around to the whole thing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I do love to bake! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have enough trouble getting around to reviewing novels!If i had to cook all the recipes first… But I would rate cookery books on how tatty, stained and how many pages are falling out.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s fair,we can assume they’re great cookbooks when they get to that stage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true! I’ve never reviewed a cookbook, but I do get them from the library. I think I could review it on pictures, ease of reading the recipes, and I would need to cook several to see how they taste and if the hubby gave a thumbs up!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fair enough. Thanks for the visit!
LikeLike
This is a really good question, Jina. I’ve seen cookbooks for review on NetGalley, and I wondered the same thing. I have no idea how someone would rate a cookbook.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve read plenty – well, partially – throughout the years, but I never rated any. And, with the ease of access through online pages, I haven’t tried a cookbook in ages.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like, like you said, if I were to rate a cookbook it would be based on the ease of comprehension. Were the recipes easy to follow? I don’t think you would need to cook everything in it. But, I do like a cookbook that I can pick up and think “I could make that!!” Believe me… There are some convoluted ones out there! I’ve had some where out of nowhere they’ll tell me to use something that wasn’t stated in the ingredients list. Or, sometimes it’s the opposite and they stated that I needed something… But, nothing ever comes of it. Why did I need the cumin if it’s never mentioned again?? WHERE DOES IT GO?!?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Honey, the cumin was just a sniffer. you know when you open a bottle of wine while you’re cooking? You use the cumin – sniff, sniff – while you’re cooking. Just try not to look dazed when the guests arrive! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ha ha ha!!! OF COURSE. Silly me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or maybe you’re supposed to throw a pinch over your shoulder, you know, for good luck.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like Betty Crocker because it assumes cooks aren’t perfect, won’t have picky ingredients, and might measure wrong. Not sure about any others!
LikeLiked by 2 people
If I have something in mind I want to cook, I go about it the modern way, Jacqui – I simply google it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jina, you raise an interesting point and I’ve never seen a review of a cookbook. However, why shouldn’t they be reviewed as everything else seems to be in today’s world. Thinking about the various cookbooks I own (I love cooking too, vegetarian) I easily find myself mentally reviewing them. My favourite held together by tape, tried most of the recipes, easy to follow instructions, great pictures, ingredients not too difficult to find, compiled with coherence and topic. Others are like long essays, ingredients which are impossible to find where I live, incomprehensible methodology! Maybe it is time more should be reviewed! 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Held together with tape”… One can safely assume it’s a great recipe collection just by reading that line!
LikeLiked by 1 person
If someone wrote a book on how to commit suicide, would you have to try it before you rated that book? What if you tried it and failed, would that make it a bad book? If you tried it and were successful, then you would not be around to write a review.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, is the person who wrote it knowledgeable with the particulars about suicide? Has he tried it before? We need to take everything into consideration before buying the book, Jim, even before we decide to read, much less review ;). How much credibility does the author have?
LikeLiked by 2 people
What a perfect answer? I have no idea, as my questions were more of the hypothetical nature, but your response was very real.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha, I was just joking, Jim!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fanny Farmer is my golden standby…given to me by my mother when I was a newlywed. We have dozens of other cookbooks, but I would not rate/review any of them, although they each contain some great recipes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, that’s exactly how I feel. Back when I used to read my mother’s cookbooks, I found some that I liked, others I didn’t, but from each book, I only tried a handful. I don’t think that qualifies me to review any. Thanks for the visit!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reminding me of many precious moments with Mama… ❤ xo
LikeLiked by 1 person
If it has more than five ingredients, forget it- 2 stars from me! lol joking of course. Recipe books are all about personal taste and ability. Not sure I’d be qualified to review them 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol! But I think you struck a point for me. Sometimes I’m in the mood for the long recipes, sometimes I hav 0 patience for them! These past two years, I want the easy ones, the kind that will be good, have the food on the table fast, and keep the kids full for hours to give me space 🙂 But come to the baking side, and I want the long recipes, the kind that will keep me occupied for hours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From what I’ve seen the ratings can be pretty subjective and include any or all of those things you described. Some people rate lower when there’s a long ingredient list or if the ingredients’ list is expensive. Some rate lower if none of the recipes appeal to them or if none are original. I have never given a cookbook below four stars because like you I would find it very hard to rate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yeah? Interesting. I’ve never seen a cookbook review on your blog before. I imagine if I were ever to try rating a cookbook, it’d probably be after I got it for a long time so I can try the recipes – at least a good numbere. Is that how it is for you?
LikeLike
That’s a great question. I have to admit I have NO idea how to rate a cookbook. Probably would help if I liked to cook. Having some experience there might give me insight into what would make for a good, or bad, cookbook.
Now I’m going to be thinking about this in the back of my mind. Thanks! 🤪
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, I hope whatever recipe you try your wife approves – and I hope you’re not like my husband, I swear every time he tries something it’s like he threw a bomb in the kitchen and closed the door hurriedly 😉
LikeLike
I’ve never thought about this before. Great question. I also enjoyed reading the comments. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! Hope you have a lovely weekend!
Btw – are my comments on your page still getting through?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope you have a lovely weekend as well. 🙂 Yes, your comments are getting through, and I’ve answered them. 😀 You are so kind to read and leave comments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All very valid questions. I don’t really buy cookbooks, so I don’t rate. There was this one time when I was gifted a cookbook. The person who gave it to me said it was the absolutely best thing since sliced bread. It was not. I quickly got rid of it. That event caused me to ask similar questions. I.e. what makes a good cookbook.
Aside from it being a totally personal preference (that person loved Indian cuisine, I do not), I would rate it based on:
– structure (If I can easily distinguish ingredients from directions, side notes and personal stories.)
– ingredients (how easy they are for me to obtain and how many of them are needed)
– directions (are they easy to follow or do you have to wonder which ingredient they mean (the one meant for the base of the cake, or the frosting?)
– pictures (They are always helpful to see how much I messed up.)
– the outcome (You know how some recipes you follow to a T and they turn out beyond perfect, and some are just waaaaay off? This isn’t something that is my fault. I blame it on the recipe.)
And no, chances are I would not read and try the whole thing.
Why? Are you writing a cookbook and are afraid of negative reviews? Or are you just skeptical of the negative reviews in general?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pictures – always helpful to see how much you messed up – haha! Not writing a recipe book, not even reading one. Now a days if I want to find out how something is made, I go about it the typical way – I google it 😉
but you can say I’m skeptical about the negative reviews.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually sympathize with those who want to write cook books. Today, people go on the Internet. You either Google it, or YouTube it.
LikeLike
That’s such a good question. I guess I wouldn’t rate it on the food (because we all have our own preferences whether it be Italian or Thai or whatever) but the ease of following the directions and whether or not it had helpful photos.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a fair way of looking at it.
LikeLike
Perhaps ease of following of instructions?
LikeLiked by 1 person
hey. Sorry I just noticed your comment!
LikeLike
I never knew you could rate recipes. I would rate them on how easy they are to follow and how clear they were. I’d rate it on the design of the book and how appealing it looks. A cookbook would have to be clear and easy to follow to be used. Otherwise it’d be making a recipe unsure what to do when.
Although in reality I don’t think anything other than that can be rated, because different strokes for different folks. Everyone rathers different types of food so what is awesome for one will be horrendous for another.
Love, light and glitter J
LikeLiked by 1 person
What’s good for one may not be for others…. that’s the rule for any kind of book. But let’s say the recipe book is easy to comprehend – would you try the recipes before you decide to rate?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm. I think so. But I don’t think I can really rate. Like books/movies when asked for ratings I think it’s based on the content itself, whereas recipes – rating is based on a whole lot more than the content. I’m sure if a recipe book was designed well it’d get a higher rating than one designed on a lesser level with better recipes.
Although maybe the rating also depends on how easy the recipes are to follow and understand
LikeLike
If it is just a list of recipes, then there is nothing to rate except try the recipes. However, like a book on any subject, a cookbook can be written not just about the subject but around the recipes. How they evolved for instance, what changes might lead to what difference in the taste, texture..I believe one can write a great book on any subject, from physics to whales.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That was my impression at first – it’s a book, why not rate it. And then I thought, I could rate the ones I read in the past. And then came the questions… how? what do I take in consideration? And then the realization that I didn’t really qualify to rate them because I never finished one – even if I tried some of the recipes from each book. What if the ones I didn’t try were the really good ones?
LikeLiked by 1 person